<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>UnSymmetrical</title>
      <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/</link>
      <description>For Your Health</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 06:10:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.21</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Drug Companies Lobby Physicians</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The pharmaceutical manufacturing giant Pfizer disclosed that it paid more than <b>$20 million to 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals</b> for consulting and speaking on its behalf in the last six months of 2009. In other words, those 4,500 doctors gave talks that forwarded the interests of drugs sold by Pfizer, and they performed consultations with an eye to selling Pfizer products in the deal. The sales angle did not necessarily need to be announced, meaning that attendees at the talks given by these doctors and those accepting consultations thought they were getting unbiased help. During that same period, Pfizer also paid <b>$15.3 million to 250 academic medical centers and other research groups</b> to sponsor clinical trials of their products.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/business/01payments.html" target=_blank>Source</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2010/05/drug_companies_lobby_physician.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2010/05/drug_companies_lobby_physician.php</guid>
         <category>Facts &amp; Statistics</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 06:10:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Sudden Cardiac Death and Food Excitotoxin Additives</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/DietCoke.jpg" width="185" height="255" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="257" align="left">
Over 460,000 people per year are now dying of a disorder called of sudden cardiac death according to CDC statistics. This is a condition striking otherwise healthy people, who have experienced no obvious symptoms of heart disease prior to their deaths. An alarming number of these deaths are occurring in young athletes, both in high schools, colleges, as well as among professional athletes.

<p> While cardiologists have found coronary disease and suspect previous scars from silent heart attacks in a number of these individuals, one mechanism is getting no attention at all, and that is excitotoxic damage caused by food additives and the artificial sweetener aspartame. This is despite growing evidence that the excitotoxic mechanism plays a major role in cardiac disease.</p>

<p>Previously, it was thought that excitotoxin food additives, such as monosodium glutamate and aspartic acid in aspartame, cause their damage in the cardiovascular centers in the brain stem and/or by over stimulating sympathetic centers in the hypothalamus of the brain. Both of these mechanisms have been shown to result in sudden cardiac death in experimental animals.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2010/04/sudden_cardiac_death_and_food.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2010/04/sudden_cardiac_death_and_food.php</guid>
         <category>Beware</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:19:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Interview with Dr. Ray Strand</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><b>Dr. Strand</b>: Well, what happened was that my wife had suffered from a disease called fibromyalgia chronic fatigue, and we had lived with this for twenty-plus years. In the 80s and 90s, she just started to go downhill. Every year, she got worse and suffered more pain and more fatigue. In 1995, she came down with serious pneumonia, and we were able to get through that, but she was left with serious chronic fatigue; she really couldn’t get out of bed for more than one to two hours a day. This went on month after month after month, and in spite of seeing four different specialists and being placed on nine different medications, she really did not improve. I didn’t get much hope from the doctors.</p>

<p>Well, at that time, someone gave my wife some nutritional supplements -- which I strongly did not believe in at that time. I was a typical doctor, and I thought that it would just create expensive urine or be a waste of money. But I told my wife, "Honey, you could try anything," because we were just not helping. When that happens to your family, it really hits home, being a physician. I have to admit that, within weeks, she got better. Within months, she was off of all of her medications, and within about five or six months, she was better than she had been in nine or ten years. That got my interest and caught my attention, and that’s when I started researching. So I have been researching nearly ten years… </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2009/11/post_15.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2009/11/post_15.php</guid>
         <category>Worth Reading</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:44:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vitamin D Prevents Cancer? WATCH THIS!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.uctv.tv/player/player_uctv_bug.swf" width="425" height="348" ><param name="movie" value="http://www.uctv.tv/player/player_uctv_bug.swf" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="previewImage=http://www.uctv.tv/images/programs/16940.jpg&movie=rtmp://webcast.ucsd.edu/vod/mp4:16940&videosize=0&buffer=1&volume=50&repeat=false&smoothing=true"  /></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2009/11/vitamin_d_prevents_cancer_watc.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2009/11/vitamin_d_prevents_cancer_watc.php</guid>
         <category>Videos</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:01:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Grain Fed vs. Grass Fed Beef</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/GrassFed2.gif" width="185" height="258" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="258" align="left">
Here are the details:

<p>VITAMIN E:  When fed on grass, cattle take in around 15 times more vitamin E per day than they do on a typical concentrate diet, and levels on the meat can be between two and three times higher as a result.</p>

<p>BETA CAROTENE:  is an anti-oxidant and vitamin A precursor, and given grass fed beef a rich yellow colored fat rather than Crisco-white colored fat.  Grass fed beef contains up to 5.5 times more beta carotene compared to grain finished beef and cattle fed fresh growing grass contained up to 11 times more than cattle fed dried forages.  In fact, the levels of beta carotene can decline up to 97% during grain feeding.</p>

<p>CONJUGATED LINOLEIC ACID (CLA) Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a nutrient found in the fat of ruminant animals that feed on green grass.  Researchers are excited about CLA because it is anti-carcinogenic at much lower dosages than many other naturally occurring anti-carcinogens. Grass finished beef has three to five times the amount of CLA as grain fed beef.</p>

<p>Research suggests CLA may:</p>

<p>1. Prevent breast cancer especially when present during mammary tissue development<br />
2. Suppress other cancers<br />
3. Inhibit and reduce atherosclerosis (plaque buildup in the arteries)<br />
4. Lower LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the blood<br />
5. Induce a relative decrease in body fat and increase in lean muscle mass<br />
6. Increase bone health and formation<br />
7. Normalize or reduce blood glucose levels and control and possibly prevent diabetes<br />
8. Enhance immune system function<br />
9. Combat allergies and asthma</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/12/post_14.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/12/post_14.php</guid>
         <category>Foods &amp; Supplements</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:45:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Acupuncture Beats Aspirin for Chronic Headache</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/Acu.jpg" width="185" height="262" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="262" align="left">
Acupuncture works better than drugs like aspirin to reduce the severity and frequency of chronic headaches, U.S. researchers reported on Monday.

<p>A review of studies involving nearly 4,000 patients with migraine, tension headache and other forms of chronic headache showed that that 62 percent of the acupuncture patients reported headache relief compared to 45 percent of people taking medications, the team at Duke University found.</p>

<p>"Acupuncture is becoming a favorable option for a variety of purposes, ranging from enhancing fertility to decreasing post-operative pain, because people experience significantly fewer side effects and it can be less expensive than other options," Dr. Tong Joo Gan, who led the study, said in a statement.</p>

<p>"This analysis reinforces that acupuncture also is a successful source of relief from chronic headaches."</p>

<p>Writing in Anesthesia and Analgesia, they said 53 percent of patients given true acupuncture were helped, compared to 45 percent receiving sham therapy involving needles inserted in non-medical positions.</p>

<p>"One of the barriers to treatment with acupuncture is getting people to understand that while needles are used, it is not a painful experience," Gan said. "It is a method for releasing your body's own natural painkillers."</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/12/acupuncture_beats_aspirin_for.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/12/acupuncture_beats_aspirin_for.php</guid>
         <category>Alternatives</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:18:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Heavy Metals and Pesticides in Wine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/Wine1.jpg" width="185" height="256" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="256" align="left">
Wine has enjoyed a volatile reputation over the years. Considered sacred in ancient Egypt, it became sinful during the prohibition, an elitist indulgence in the post-war years, a health hazard in the 1960's, and finally a healthy tonic that delivered antioxidants and heart health in recent decades. But now, some disturbing news may cause wine to undergo yet another redefinition.

<p>According to a <a href="http://www.webmd.com/news/20081029/heavy-metals-found-in-wine" target=_blank>study out of Kingston University in London</a>, many wines contain heavy metals up to 200 times the amount considered safe. The researchers measured "Target Hazard Quotients (THQ)" in wines from 15 countries throughout Europe, South America, and the Middle East. A THQ of one or more is considered unsafe, but according to the researchers, most wines came in at a whopping 50 to 200. <font color="white"><b>To give you perspective, seafood considered dangerous usually falls between a THQ of one and five.</b></font></p>

<p>The Environmental Protection Agency established guidelines for safe levels of heavy metals based on frequent, long-term exposure, so ostensibly, drinking one glass of wine with a high THQ won't have much impact on your health; drinking a glass every night for years most certainly will. Underlining this contention, Dr. Weiss of the University of Rochester commented: "Any time you see numbers like they have in this study, you begin to scratch your head and wonder about the effects over a long period of ingestion: Not one glass of wine last Tuesday, but a glass a day over a lifetime."<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/11/heavy_metals_and_pesticides_in.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/11/heavy_metals_and_pesticides_in.php</guid>
         <category>Foods &amp; Supplements</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:59:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Benefit Of Wheatgrass</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/WheatGrass.jpg" width="185" height="254" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="256" align="left">
Wheatgrass juice. That little cup of dark green juice pressed from young wheat plants can be found at virtually any heath store and juice bar. In recent years, wheatgrass juice has become one of the more popular diet foods available.

<p>However, many people cringe at the thought of consuming one ounce of this "miracle food" and will instead turn to their coffee and pastries. Whether it’s because of its pungent taste, or its seemingly undesirable color, chances are most of you have never consumed wheatgrass juice. I’m here to tell you that whether you’ve never thought of sampling it, you just flat out refuse to give it a try, wheatgrass juice is extremely beneficial not only as food, but as an overall tonic for various ailments.</p>

<p>Wheatgrass is grown through a process known as sprouting. Sprouts are "complete foods" because they contain all other essential dietary nutrients, along with the enzymes to help assimilate them. They are easily digested and enter the bloodstream quickly. The nutrients in wheatgrass juice are completely assimilated by the human body in 20 minutes. For this reason sprouts are "quick energy" foods. Wheat sprouts contain four times more folic acid, and six times more Vitamin C, than unsprouted wheat or ordinary grass.</p>

<p>Humans can’t eat straight wheatgrass because the strong cellulose makes it too woody and fibrous for the long and complex intestines in humans. Grass eating animals, however, ( cows, horses, goats, etc.) have short intestines. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/10/the_benefit_of_wheatgrass.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/10/the_benefit_of_wheatgrass.php</guid>
         <category>Foods &amp; Supplements</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:44:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>46 Million Affected By Trace Amounts Of Drugs In Drinking Water</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/Water.jpeg" width="185" height="262" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="262" align="left">
Testing prompted by an Associated Press story that revealed trace amounts of pharmaceuticals in drinking water supplies has shown that more Americans are affected by the problem than previously thought — at least 46 million.

<p>That's up from 41 million people reported by the AP in March as part of an investigation into the presence of pharmaceuticals in the nation's waterways.</p>

<p>The AP stories prompted federal and local legislative hearings, brought about calls for mandatory testing and disclosure, and led officials in at least 27 additional metropolitan areas to analyze their drinking water. Positive tests were reported in 17 cases, including Reno, Nev., Savannah, Ga., Colorado Springs, Colo., and Huntsville, Ala. Results are pending in three others.</p>

<p>The test results, added to data from communities and water utilities that bowed to pressure to disclose earlier test results, produce the new total of Americans known to be exposed to drug-contaminated drinking water supplies.</p>

<p>The overwhelming majority of U.S. cities have not tested drinking water while eight cities — including Boston, Phoenix and Seattle — were relieved that tests showed no detections.</p>

<p>"We didn't think we'd find anything because our water comes from a pristine source, but after the AP stories we wanted to make sure and reassure our customers," said Andy Ryan, spokesman for Seattle Public Utilities.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/46_million_affected_by_trace_a.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/46_million_affected_by_trace_a.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:38:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Drink Milk For Healthy Bones...Or Not!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/MilkBone.jpg" width="185" height="269" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="269" align="left">
A new study has found that when kids consume high levels of dairy, they develop greater bone density and more bone-mineral content. The study, out of <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/ehs-cdi081108.php" target=_blank>Boston University School of Medicine</a>, followed 106 children, aged three to six, over a 12-year period. At the conclusion of the research, the children who had consumed at least two servings of dairy daily had bone mineral content 175 grams higher than those who consumed less than that. Plus, the kids who ate at least four ounces of meat or other protein a day in addition to two servings of dairy had bone-mineral content a whopping 200-grams higher than the kids who ate less dairy and meat.

<p>The findings generated headlines announcing, for instance, that "Childhood Dairy Intake May Improve Adolescent Bone Health" (Science Daily) and "Childhood Dairy Intake Boosts Bone Health Later On," (US News and World Report). Meanwhile, chief researcher Dr. Lynn Moore points out, "...dairy is a key source of proteins, calcium, and other micronutrients including phosphorus and vitamin D." The implication is that kids should gulp down the moo juice so that they grow up strong, healthy, and tough.</p>

<p>Holy cow! I'm ready to hang it up and go out and eat an 18-ounce steak and drink a quart of milk! Or not.</p>

<p>What we have here is an example of how facts can be misleading. Because while it may be true that drinking lots of milk builds up bone density in kids, it's also true that dense bones in childhood don't necessarily equate to healthy bones as you age. Surprise, building up bone density by consuming dairy for years on end sets you up for a greater likelihood of osteoporosis later on.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/drink_milk_for_healthy_bonesor.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/drink_milk_for_healthy_bonesor.php</guid>
         <category>Beware</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:05:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Low Cholesterol Increases Cancer And Death Risk</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/Cholesterol1.jpg" width="185" height="253" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="256" align="left">
In a major shot fired across the bow of the statin marketing machine, the levels of LDL cholesterol that are the artificial targets of “health” promoted by the American Heart Association (AHA) are now found to be associated with a significant <a href="http://www.wellnessresources.com/studies/entry/low_cholesterol_associated_with_cancer_and_death" target=_blank>increased risk of cancer and death</a>.

<p>The AHA recommends an LDL level of 100 for prevention and 70 for high risk patients. In the new study an LDL level of 107 was associated with a 33% increased risk of cancer and death, an LDL level of 87 was associated with a 50% increased risk. As the LDL goes lower the risk keeps getting worse. These arbitrary AHA levels for LDL cholesterol were established by “experts” with direct financial ties to the <a href="http://www.wellnessresources.com/content/articles/the_statin_scam_marches_on/" target=_blank>statin industry</a>, who knew full well that reaching their artificially low target levels for LDL would require double and triple doses of statin drugs, thus dramatically increasing sales (which has indeed happened).</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.wellnessresources.com/freedom/articles/vytorin_fraud_blasted_at_heart_meeting/" target=_blank>Vytorin fraud</a> has pointed out quite clearly that lowering LDL cholesterol to very low levels does not reduce cardiovascular disease. Another <a href="http://www.wellnessresources.com/freedom/articles/vytorin_increases_cancer_risk_by_64/" target=_blank>Vytorin study</a> also shows doing so increases cancer risk by 64%. The new study paints the clear picture that lowering LDL too low actually increases the rate of death from any cause. This new study also points out the statistical shenanigans that the statin industry uses to hide the actual risks of these drugs in the studies that have been published. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/low_cholesterol_increases_canc.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/low_cholesterol_increases_canc.php</guid>
         <category>Beware</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:15:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>British Conductor Claims Vitamin C Reversed His Cancer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/Intravenous.jpg" width="185" height="264" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="262" align="left">
A Check-up six months ago revealed Denis Vaughan's prostate cancer was becoming more active.

<p>Vaughan, an orchestral conductor and one of the driving forces behind the creation of the National Lottery, has had prostate cancer for 12 years.</p>

<p>Because the tumour wasn't considered aggressive enough for surgery or radiotherapy, his consultant at University College Hospital had agreed on a policy of watchful waiting, while Denis kept it at bay with diet and exercise. </p>

<p>Then, his prostate specific antigen (PSA) score, which measures how active the tumour is, went from 13 to 18.5 'and the watching became a bit anxious'.</p>

<p>His oncologist wanted him to take drugs or begin radiotherapy, but Vaughan, who is a strong believer in a natural approach to health, preferred to try a treatment offered by his London GP that involved infusing vitamin C into the bloodstream.</p>

<p>He underwent weekly treatment  -  with up to 75 grams of vitamin C at a time (the recommended daily amount is 60mg).</p>

<p>The treatment, which cost £100 a time, appears to have worked  -  after seven weeks, his PSA dropped back down to 13, a level described as moderately elevated, and he's back on watchful waiting. His oncologist has said he now doesn't need to see Vaughan for another year. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/britishconductor_claims_vitami.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/09/britishconductor_claims_vitami.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:51:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Big Plastic Paid Off The FDA?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/Cans.jpg" width="185" height="262" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="256" align="left">
One dangerous, widely used and well researched chemicals that is found in many plastics is called Bisphenol A, or BPA for short. This chemical is found in sippy cups, the epoxy linings of canned food, baby bottles and countless other items. The organisations producing these products have fought hard and must have somehow bought out the FDA. It is obviously clear through years of research that the hormone disrupting chemical is dangerous, but through aggressive Search Engine Marketing, the creation of websites such as bisphenol-a.org, by employing their own scientists and lobbyists, and possibly buying out the FDA, Big Plastic has triumphed as the FDA has given their ruling that BPA is not dangerous. This has outraged the scientific community, including scientists, doctors and politicians with half a brain. 

<p>The main problem with BPA is that it's being used in CANNED FOODS and baby bottles such at Avent's plastic baby bottles. Numerous studies have shown that when the baby bottles are exposed to boiling water or when they are put through the dishwasher they break down and the BPA seeps into the baby's milk/formula. </p>

<p>When legitimate scientists have conducted studies on BPA, it is consistently linked to obesity, developmental problems, risk for heart attack, and breast and prostate cancer. Even if there was the slightest chance that BPA was dangerous the FDA should've banned it from plastics, especially BABY BOTTLES. What could be worse for a baby then to expose them to these risks?!?!?! </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/08/big_plastic_paid_off_the_fda.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/08/big_plastic_paid_off_the_fda.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:46:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Red Bull Gives You Wings - and Heart Trouble?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/mt-static/images/site/RedBull.jpg" width="185" height="256" align="left" vspace="2" border="1" style="border-color: white"><img src="/mt-static/images/site/blank.gif" width="7" height="256" align="left">
Red Bull may claim to “give you wings” but drinking too much of the popular energy drink may also lead to heart damage, a study suggests.

<p>A study of 30 university students aged between 20 and 24 years old found that drinking just one 250ml sugar-free can of the caffeinated energy drink increased the “stickiness” of the blood and raised the risk of blood clots forming.</p>

<p>Using tests to measure blood pressure and the state of blood vessels around the body, the Australian researchers said that after drinking one can participants had shown a cardiovascular profile similar to that of someone with heart disease.</p>

<p>Red Bull today emphatically denied that the drink, which is distributed to 143 countries worldwide, was dangerous. In a statement, it said that Red Bull had been proved safe by “numerous scientific studies”, and that it had never been banned from anywhere it had been introduced. </p>

<p>Scott Willoughby, of the Cardiovascular Research Centre at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and Adelaide University, said that he was alarmed at the results, and suggested that older adults who already have symptoms of heart disease should refrain from drinking too much of the energy drink. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/08/red_bull_gives_you_wings_and_h.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/08/red_bull_gives_you_wings_and_h.php</guid>
         <category>News</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:47:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Statistic</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there are an estimated 76 million cases of foodborne illness each year in the US alone, causing about 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/08/statistic_9.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.unsymmetrical.com/2008/08/statistic_9.php</guid>
         <category>Facts &amp; Statistics</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:53:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
